I check The Daily WTF for their chronicling of interesting and perverse efforts in the software world. While the quality of the articles has… suffered somewhat recently, the commenters often produce utter gems. Such as this delightful offering in response to Extra-Boolean ‘logic’
Re: Extra Boolean
2014-06-02 06:55 â€¢ by QJoÂ (unregistered)
|This leads itself to expansion:
Smidgeon of truth
Not Entirely Sure
… and so on.
Is it then possible to assign a complement operation upon an ExtraBoolean such that the complement of e.g. Seriously Doubtful is Probably True? Or does one need to posit the existence of statements whose extra-boolean truthiness and falsitude are in fact independent? e.g. a statement may be Most False but at the same time Possibly True? We could build an entire field of mathematics upon this concept. Perhaps model a statement’s Extra-booleanity on the complex plane: truthiness along the real axis and falsitude along the complex. Then a statement that is purely Political Statement, when multiplied by the negative square root of minus one becomes a Religious Conviction?
Might this analysis be used to get to the bottom of the relationship between US and UK during the early 2000’s?
Personally, I love the whole idea that a Political Statement multiplied by the negative square root of minus one can become a Religious Conviction. It explains so much!
One thought on “When is True and False not True and False”
And I’m thinking of a very common usage in Luther’s Small Catechism: “This is most certainly true” 😀